<div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">Hello my friends, </font></div><div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif"> </font></div><div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">I wonder if someone has done this before? i would like to implement 2 Kamailio servers with redundancy, something like the following:</font></div>
<div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif"> </font></div><div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">SERVER_A is working as the primary sip proxy (virtual IP as the sip signaling), if it fails, the other server (sleeping) should UP the virtual IP and takes all the traffic....i guess there is many Linux implementations thah can do this, but i would like to know if there is someone that has done this before and hear some recomendations...</font></div>
<div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif"> </font></div><div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">I've read some difficulty in the <span style="line-height:13px">synchronisation of registrations </span><span style="line-height:13px">because Kamailio works best when it stores
registrations in memory and registrations are constantly changing - they
expire and are renewed, as well as new ones joining and old ones leaving. </span><span style="line-height:13px">To make the failover solution function seamlessly, it is necessary to synchronise the in-memory registrations between
the primary and the backup server </span><span style="line-height:13px">. This can be done by forking a copy of the
registration request to the backup server, but there are some practical
problems in doing this, has anyone do something with this?</span></font></div><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;color:black"><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">
<br>
</font></span><div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">Thanks in advance!</font></div><br><br>