<br>Looks Great Jeremy, <br><br>I will see if there is of any help for me and let u know. <br><br>Thanks for sharing <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Jeremy McNamara <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jj@indie.org">jj@indie.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">On 3/17/11 6:23 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
In some cases, it can be, depending on what you're doing with Asterisk to begin with. Pure call routing without any of the interactivity that Asterisk introduces is a valid application for a solitary Kamailio setup. But you're right, many real-world call transit applications can't get by on Kamailio alone.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br></div>
It is possible to only setup Kamailio to do far end nat-traversal without proxying RTP. So, depending on the 'world' in question a B2BUA / Asterisk might not be absolutely required.<br>
<br>
<br>
I have a simple configuration on my blog: <a href="http://bit.ly/f8X9SN" target="_blank">http://bit.ly/f8X9SN</a><br>
<br>
<br>
Comments and/or improvements are absolutely welcome!<br><font color="#888888">
<br>
<br>
<br>
Jeremy McNamara</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org" target="_blank">sr-users@lists.sip-router.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users" target="_blank">http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>