<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hello,<br>
<br>
On 7/28/11 1:31 AM, Anto wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CA+Ecp7Sm9iFPiORGpeUbukPovQapWtUxtehYtsgzxD_qbQtQfQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite"><span id="result_box" class="long_text"><span
style="background-color: rgb(235, 239, 249);" title="Hola">Hello
<br>
<br>
</span><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"
title="Se me presenta un problema porque no se como asimilar
la implementacion.">It presents a problem because I do not
know how to assimilate the implementation. </span><span
style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" title="Hasta
ahora teniamos un diseño de un proxy para balancear la salida
entre varios gateway, pero se va a añadir otro proxy para otro
servicio (de otros usuarios) y usara los mismos gateway de
salida o quizas distintos (aun no se que sera mejor, si">Until
now we had a design of a proxy to balance out between several
gateway, but it will add another proxy for another service
(other users) and use the same gateway output or perhaps
different (although not that be better if </span><span
title="dividir o unificar los gateway).">divide or unify the
gateway). </span><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255,
255);" title="El problema lo tengo con el enrutado de entrada,
que no se muy bien como implementarlo.">The problem as I have
with the routing entry, which is not very well how to
implement it.
<br>
<br>
</span><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"
title="Ahora tenemos el diseño asi:">Now we have the design
like this:
<br>
<br>
-GW ----\ <br>
/ -
CARRIER1<br>
USER ------ KAMAILIO ----- GW ---- +<br>
\ -
CARRIER2<br>
-GW ----/</span><span
title="-GW ----/"><br>
<br>
</span><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"
title="Y pasara a ser asi:">And becomes like this:
<br>
<br>
-GW ----\ <br>
/ - CARRIER1<br>
USER ------ KAMAILIOSERVICE1 ----- GW ---- +<br>
\ - CARRIER2<br>
-GW ----/<br>
<br>
-GW ----\ <br>
/ - CARRIER1<br>
USER ------ KAMAILIOSERVICE2 ----- GW ---- +<br>
\ - CARRIER2<br>
-GW ----/<br>
</span><span title="-GW ----/"><br>
<br>
</span><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"
title="O quizas usando los mismos gateway.">Or maybe using the
same gateway.
<br>
<br>
</span><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"
title="El problema es que cada carrier nos proporciona varios
DID (utilizo los mismos para ambos servicios).">The problem is
that each carrier provides DID number (I use the same for both
services). </span><span style="background-color: rgb(255,
255, 255);" title="Habia pensado poner un kamailio entre los
gateway y los carriers, que compruebe el did de que servicio
es y lo mande a su correspondiente gateway (en el caso de
tener los gateway por separado) o bien, ponerlo entre los
gateway y los proxy haciendo la">Kamailio had thought to put a
gateway between the carriers and that they did check the
service and send it to the corresponding gateway (in the case
of the gateway separately), or put it in the proxy gateway and
making </span><span title="comprobacion para saber a que
proxy enrutar (en el caso de usar los mismos gateway).">checking
for routing to proxy (in the case of using the same gateway).
</span><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"
title="¿Cual seria mejor?¿Alguna recomendacion de como llevar
esto a la practica?.">What would be better? Any
recommendations on how to put this into practice?.
<br>
<br>
</span><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"
title="Lo que mayor duda me crea, es la tabla de enrutado, ya
que si este nuevo proxy enruta el trafico de entrada y deja su
ip en el campo via, tambien pasara por el los datos de salida
(tengo dudas si a nivel SIP, siguiendo">The biggest question
that I believe is the routing table, as if this new proxy
routes the traffic into and leaves her in the field via ip,
also pass through the output data (I have doubts whether SIP
level, following </span><span title="estandar, se puede hacer
que no pase por el la salida) y quisiera que fuese directo
(USER->PROXY->GW->CARRIER), solo pasando por el la
entrada.">standard, you can not pass through the exit) and
want it to be direct (USER -> Proxy -> GW ->
CARRIER), just past the entrance.
<br>
<br>
</span><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"
title="¿Alguien me podria aconsejar donde podria encontrar mas
informacion para montar este escenario?.">Anyone could advise
me where I could find more information to set up this
scenario?. </span><span style="background-color: rgb(255,
255, 255);" title="gracias y perdon por molestarles con esta
duda ;-).">thanks and sorry for bothering you with this
question ;-).
<br>
</span></span></blockquote>
unfortunately I was not able to understand exactly what you are
looking for. Are you asking hints about the best way to route calls
from carriers towards users? If you control the gateways, then you
can instruct there where to send the calls based on DID. Otherwise,
both kamailio instances can have some did map (for example using
mtree module) and route locally through location or send the calls
to the other kamailio instance.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Daniel<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.asipto.com">http://www.asipto.com</a>
Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://asipto.com/u/kat">http://asipto.com/u/kat</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://linkedin.com/in/miconda">http://linkedin.com/in/miconda</a> -- <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://twitter.com/miconda">http://twitter.com/miconda</a></pre>
</body>
</html>