<div dir="ltr"><div>I do get the parse error.</div>
<div>Still, I think that even if kamailio stoped processing the request, an error reply should be sent back the the request sender, no?</div>
<div>Something like - 501 ??</div>
<div> </div>
<div>>I think in such cases you get a "parse error" in the log. Do you?<br>>If yes, then Kamailio stops processing the packet and no reply is sent.<br>><br>>Reda<br><br><br><br>On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Uri Shacked <<a href="http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users">ushacked at gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>><i> OK understood.<br></i>><i> I tried with no "TO" header as well, and still no error reply....<br></i>><i> Is there suppose to be a reply from core?<br></i>><i><br></i>><i> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Andrew Pogrebennyk <<br>
</i>><i> <a href="http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users">apogrebennyk at sipwise.com</a>> wrote:<br></i>><i><br></i>>><i> On 06/19/2012 02:06 PM, Uri Shacked wrote:<br></i>>><i> > I am testing kamailio replies when an INVITE or another request arrives<br>
</i>>><i> > with lets say, "VIA" header missing....<br></i>>><i> > The core drops the request. But, there is no reply for the originator<br></i>>><i> > (so it keep on resending the request...)<br>
</i>>><i> > Why?<br></i>>><i><br></i>>><i> If there was no Via header, the recipient would have no way to know<br></i>>><i> where to send the response.<br></i>>><i><br></i>><i><br></i></div>
</div>