<div class="gmail_quote"><div>Dear SamyGo</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for your response.</div><div><br></div><div>Yes you're right a folder called rtpproxy.so was left in the directory /usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules_k that had not been updated to the date kamailio was compiled and once i deleted it everything was then ok. I checked in directory /usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules and there i found a new rtpproxy.so folder that was updated on the installation date. Seems like rtpproxy.so in the new version is installed in /usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules and not in /usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules_k. Is that correct?</div>
<div><br></div><div>Well everything is working ok now!</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for your assistance!</div><div>Regards</div><div>Phillip</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Message: 4<br>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:29:35 +0500<br>
From: SamyGo <<a href="mailto:govoiper@gmail.com">govoiper@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy module issue<br>
To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -<br>
Users Mailing List" <<a href="mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org">sr-users@lists.sip-router.org</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<CAJUJwtjB7fmm1pa60wJMLPPte=<a href="mailto:Qu_AeZ1z2aqysQaZch_Pb%2BdQ@mail.gmail.com">Qu_AeZ1z2aqysQaZch_Pb+dQ@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Hi,<br>
<br>
Though not an expert, I got few things in mind for your case. In the<br>
upgrade process the modules folder remain the same ? right ! if that is so<br>
is there any chances that the new installation skipped installation of<br>
newer rtpproxy module and hence the old version rtpproxy module could've<br>
been left in place. That could be a reason for not identifying the older<br>
module.<br>
This whole speculation could be wrong if the newer version supports the<br>
older version modules.<br>
<br>
BR<br>
Sammy<br>
<br>
<br>
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:56 AM, phillman25 <<a href="mailto:phillman25@gmail.com">phillman25@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Dear List<br>
><br>
> I have just upgraded from kamailio V3.2.2 to kamailio V 3.3.1<br>
> However, when trying to start kamailio its giving me the below error:<br>
><br>
><br>
> ERROR: <core> [sr_module.c:572]: ERROR: load_module: could not open module<br>
> </usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules_k/rtpproxy.so>:<br>
> /usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules_k/rtpproxy.so: undefined symbol: qm_realloc<br>
> : <core> [cfg.y:3591]: parse error in config file<br>
> /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 245, column 12-24: failed to<br>
> load module<br>
><br>
><br>
> Does anyone know why rtpproxy module cannot be loaded?<br>
><br>
><br>
> This is the output of ldd /usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules_k/rtpproxy.so:<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> shell-init: error retrieving current directory: getcwd: cannot access<br>
> parent directories: No such file or directory<br>
> linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00276000)<br>
> libkmi.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/kamailio/libkmi.so.1 (0x00b64000)<br>
> libkcore.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/kamailio/libkcore.so.1 (0x00768000)<br>
> libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0x00277000)<br>
> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00114000)<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Regards Phillip<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org">sr-users@lists.sip-router.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users" target="_blank">http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users</a><br>
><br>
><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20120816/919fdda5/attachment-0001.htm" target="_blank">http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20120816/919fdda5/attachment-0001.htm</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 5<br>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:45:57 +0200<br>
From: Klaus Darilion <<a href="mailto:klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at">klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Is Route Header in SIP Invite Mandatory?<br>
To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -<br>
Users Mailing List" <<a href="mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org">sr-users@lists.sip-router.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:502CC155.5030603@pernau.at">502CC155.5030603@pernau.at</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>
<br>
On 16.08.2012 09:40, Apoorv Khare wrote:<br>
> Hi All,<br>
><br>
> Does Kamailio has a mandatory requirement for SIP Invite to have Route<br>
> header? Although RFC-3261 doesn't have.<br>
<br>
Kamailio does not have a requirement on Route headers. Although you can<br>
check manually for a Router header and handle requests different.<br>
<br>
> My requirement is to take out route header from the client if I do that<br>
> I don't see PRACK being send out from Kamilio to Media GW which causes<br>
> call drop eventually in 15sec. Any thoughts..........<br>
<br>
Maybe you can re-phrase your problem. I didn't understand it.<br>
<br>
regards<br>
Klaus<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
sr-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org">sr-users@lists.sip-router.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users" target="_blank">http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users</a><br>
<br>
<br>
End of sr-users Digest, Vol 87, Issue 52<br>
****************************************<br>
</blockquote></div><br>