Hi Daniel, Peter, Klaus. <div><br></div><div>Sorry for delay I accidentally muted this thread :(<br><div><br></div><div>Thanks for the advice and great to hear it is being worked on. I will keep you updated on our testing.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Richard<div><br><div><div><div class="gmail_quote">On 25 September 2012 11:52, Klaus Darilion <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at" target="_blank">klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im"><br>
<br>
On 25.09.2012 10:16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hello,<br>
<br>
On 9/10/12 3:52 PM, Richard Brady wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
The other thing to consider within the "flow switching part" is the<br>
ability to "provide a limited version of a STUN server on the same<br>
interface and UDP port" as SIP.<br>
</blockquote>
this is implemented (or at least partial) - I had no chance to look<br>
better at it to know exactly how far it is, being developed during SER<br>
times. See the files ser_stun.{c,h} in the core.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Hi Richard! If you want to test it, make sure to enable the code with STUN=1 while building.<br>
<br>
regards<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Klaus</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org" target="_blank">sr-users@lists.sip-router.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users" target="_blank">http://lists.sip-router.org/<u></u>cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-<u></u>users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></div>