<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hello,<br>
<br>
what value you have for
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
failure_reply_mode parameter of tm?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Daniel<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/14/12 3:12 PM, Alex Balashov
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:50A3A6D4.5000106@evaristesys.com" type="cite">I
am using the latest pull of branch 3.3, and t_branch_timeout()
doesn't work if the previous branch resulted in a reply (i.e. a
negative final reply).
<br>
<br>
That is to say, t_branch_timeout() == FALSE on a genuine timeout,
as long as the preceding branch provided a result (such as 404).
<br>
<br>
t_branch_timeout() == TRUE if this is a timeout, on the first
branch.
<br>
<br>
In other words, it appears that if t_any_replied() == TRUE, then
t_branch_timeout() == FALSE, even for this branch, and even if the
branch really did time out (no response at all from destination).
<br>
<br>
That's not how the documentation says it should behave. Am I
doing something wrong? If so, how do I find out if _this
particular_ branch timed out, from the failure_route[]?
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.asipto.com">http://www.asipto.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://twitter.com/#!/miconda">http://twitter.com/#!/miconda</a> - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda">http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda</a></pre>
</body>
</html>