<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Hi Daniel <br>
<br>
I wrote in my first patch announcing email, that i didn't test the
patched dns resolution without cache.<br>
I only tested with dns cache.<br>
<br>
This is the reason why i didn't recognize this problem.<br>
You are right I made a mistake, but now it is corrected.<br>
<br>
Many Thanks,<br>
Misi<br>
<br>
On 2012-12-04 17:47, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:50BE2914.3050802@gmail.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
Hello,<br>
<br>
I was looking to the patch and I spotted that you didn't assign
anymore a value to he variable -- next is the specific part of the
diff:<br>
<br>
- /* fallback to normal srv lookup */<br>
- he=srv_sip_resolvehost(name, 0, port, proto, 0, 0);<br>
+ /* fallback to srv lookup */<br>
+ no_naptr_srv_sip_resolvehost(name,port,proto);<br>
<br>
Shouldn't be like: he =
no_naptr_srv_sip_resolvehost(name,port,proto);<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Daniel<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/30/12 10:31 AM, MÉSZÁROS Mihály
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:50B87D00.9090302@niif.hu" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
Hi,<br>
<br>
On 2012-11-30 09:07, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:50B86929.5050901@gmail.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
Hello,<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/19/12 10:18 AM, MÉSZÁROS
Mihály wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:50A9F96D.9020701@niif.hu" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
Hi Daniel,<br>
<br>
On 2012-11-14 12:51, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:50A385DD.7080300@gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
Hello,<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/12/12 10:50 AM,
MÉSZÁROS Mihály wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:50A11AE2.5040305@niif.hu"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
Hi,<br>
<br>
I made some progress. As I stated before, I made a patch
and submitted to git branch misi/dns_srv.<br>
I tested with dns cache. It works for me.<br>
<br>
I made it also available for case if "no dns cache" is
used too,<br>
but it isn't tested yet.<br>
<br>
Please review my commit, and let me know if any
corrections needed. <br>
</blockquote>
if nobody does it meanwhile, I can look over it next week
and also check properly what's all about this discussion,
currently being out of the office.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
After you had time to review it, please let me know your
thoughts.<br>
</blockquote>
unfortunately I had no time to look at it yet. Hopefully I
will find some soon.<br>
<br>
Btw, is it complete? IIRC, I saw something like it still has
to be extended.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
It is complete and working patch. <br>
If there are no NAPTR records to a domain, then according to the
local protocol preference it orders protocols and it tries to
resolve SRV records according this ordered list. If there is no
order then the order is udp,tcp,tls,sctp,..<br>
<br>
SRV records are resolved in order Kamailio dns protocol
preference. <br>
My algorithm picks and returns with the first protocol
resolvable SRV record, so it sets from SRV the port and
protocol.<br>
(Of course if there are no SRV at all then it fallbacks to host
resolving so dns "A" record.)<br>
<br>
It is big step forward comparing to current Kamailio behavior
where it is using strictly udp only and after it stops searching
SRV records at all, and go for "A" record!<br>
<br>
As i wrote in my patch announcing email it is a step further on
the way to conforming with RFC3263, but my patch not handling
fallback if there are SRV-s for multiple protocols in DNS. <br>
In such case only and only if the first protocol is temporary
not available or fails we are not falling back to other protocol
but falling back to host resolving so "A" record (and/or AAAA).<br>
<br>
Can you send meg the iirc message what was there exactly? <br>
Is there any other problem in it?<br>
I guess no just what i explained above.<br>
<br>
I am eagerly waiting your review and comment.<br>
<br>
Thanks in advance!<br>
Misi<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.asipto.com">http://www.asipto.com</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda">http://twitter.com/#!/miconda</a> - <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda">http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>