<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>7 maj 2013 kl. 05:10 skrev Khoa Pham <<a href="mailto:onmyway133@gmail.com">onmyway133@gmail.com</a>>:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">Hi,<div><br></div><div>As someone asked in <a href="http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2010-December/066792.html">http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2010-December/066792.html</a> about TCP overload, Daniel answerd that </div>
<div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">"<span style="">if you have some lengthily operations that have </span></font><span style="font-family: tahoma, sans-serif; ">to be applied to your sip traffic and you get congestion because of </span><span style="font-family: tahoma, sans-serif; ">that, the solution is to use a kamailio as load balancer in front of a </span><span style="font-family: tahoma, sans-serif; ">farm of proxy doing the actual processing</span><span style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif">"</span></div>
<div><div><br></div><div style="">How to use Kamailio as load balancer ?</div></div></div></blockquote><br></div><div>Another way is to try to suspend incoming transactions and process them in a background process. This has been discussed many times and you can find more information in the mailing list archives.</div><div><br></div><div>/O</div><br></body></html>