Dear Daniel,<br />
<br />
If I understood your scenario correctly, you are going first to store the details of a call to a subscriber which is not registered and when this sub will be online, you will send a message that will contain these details.<br />
I think that the provided by Carlos Ruiz Díaz are being used to send the message and not to store it.<br />
Could you please provide me a complete example of your scenario in order to understand clearly?<br />
<br />
Best regards. <br />
<br />
----- Αρχικü μÞνυμα ----- <br />
Απü: daniel@pocos.nl<br />
Ημ/νßα: ΤετÜρτη, 12 Ιουνßου 2013 12:03 μμ<br />
Πρüς: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org<br />
CC: sipatse@in.gr<br />
ΘÝμα: Re: [SR-Users] Missed calls notification supporting<br />
<br />
<pre>On Wednesday 12 June 2013 06:26:38 sipatse@in.gr wrote:
> What I would like to do is :
> 1)An invite comes Towards a local subscriber
> 2)Perform a location lookup
> 3)this sub is not registered so location info was not found
> 4)Use function uac_req_(key) to build a message
> 5)Use function uac_req_send to send a message informing him about missed
> calls
> 6)Because this sub is offline, this message will be stored in silo
> table
> 7)when he will be registered again this message will be sent to him
>
> Is this the correct way to do that or not?
I don't have experience with MSILO. It appears you could use that, but my use
of uac_req_send would be just like Carlos Ruiz Díaz mentioned. Store incoming
missed calls in a db. If user registers push the information as MESSAGE from
the REGISTER route.
Using MSILO seems a bit tricky, the example is geared towards storing incoming
MESSAGEs, not locally generated ones.
--
POCOS B.V. - Croy 9c - 5653 LC Eindhoven
Telefoon: 040 293 8661 - Fax: 040 293 8658
http://www.pocos.nl/ - http://www.sipo.nl/
K.v.K. Eindhoven 17097024</pre>