<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Hello,<br>
    <br>
    can you share the database record or kamctl mi dlg_list for such
    call? It helps to see if record route values are stored properly in
    first place.<br>
    <br>
    Cheers,<br>
    Daniel<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05/12/13 14:47, Efelin Novak wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CABKTgAobc9zz_fW8P+zc6FDHP0KU49GgzOe4FseUK632g1xW1w@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <div>
                          <div>Hi,<br>
                            <br>
                          </div>
                          I locally generate BYE using dlg_end_dlg. When
                          I want to end a call that is "transport layer"
                          bridged, the BYE is not sent to first hop in
                          route_set but directly to the endpoint. In
                          such BYE there are no Route headers. In
                          non-bridging calls Routes are correctly placed
                          and the message is routed to the first "hop".<br>
                          <br>
                        </div>
                        When the error happens, this is written to a
                        log:<br>
                        <br>
                        WARNING: rr [loose.c:821]: after_loose(): no
                        socket found for match second RR<br>
                        <br>
                      </div>
                      Here ([SR-Users] no socket found for match second
                      RR) I have read this is only a warning, but in my
                      configuration it seriously influences the message
                      routing.<br>
                      <br>
                    </div>
                    My setup is<br>
                    <br>
                  </div>
                  phone1(192.168.10.3) <--TCP-->
                  kamailio1(192.168.10.2) <--UDP-->
                  kamailio2(192.168.5.3) <--UDP--> phone2<br>
                  <br>
                </div>
                On kamailio1 I generate dlg_end_dlg and the BYE is sent
                to phone1 and phone2 directly.<br>
                <br>
              </div>
              I'm using Kamailio 4.0.4 on Debian machines.<br>
              <br>
            </div>
            How can I make the Kamailio1 to send the BYE to kamailio2 in
            the transport layer bridging scenario? Do I have some
            misconfiguration or this is not a correct behaviour?<br>
            <br>
          </div>
          Thanks for answer<br>
          <br>
        </div>
        Efelin<br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org">sr-users@lists.sip-router.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users">http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.asipto.com">http://www.asipto.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://twitter.com/#!/miconda">http://twitter.com/#!/miconda</a> - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda">http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda</a></pre>
  </body>
</html>