<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Hello,<br>
    <br>
    should be in request_route or reply_route (from core) only, before
    creating the transaction and not after doing record_route() for
    requests.<br>
    <br>
    Cheers,<br>
    Daniel<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 29/08/14 16:18, Sebastian Damm
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CABkWSFyKJmbwfcem_d_5ey9Ka8kUJN49a=wzjAeoyBq9u=SUgw@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>Hi,<br>
          <br>
        </div>
        okay, so I really misunderstood the IP parameter. Thanks for
        your solution, from the first look it does work. Is there
        anything I should consider or watch specifically when using
        msg_apply_changes() in the middle of processing the request?<br>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">Best Regards,<br>
          Sebastian<br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
          <br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:52 PM,
            Daniel-Constantin Mierla <span dir="ltr"><<a
                moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:miconda@gmail.com"
                target="_blank">miconda@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
              <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> Hello,<br>
                <br>
                the second parameter is to give the IP to appear in sdp,
                instead of the rtpproxy ip.<br>
                <br>
                What you can try is to update the sdp with
                fix_natted_sdp() with the source IP as seen by the LB,
                then do msg_apply_changes() and pass the flag to trust
                the ip in sdp -- not sure it is going to work, by worth
                giving a try.<br>
                <br>
                Perhaps a flag to overwrite the source IP would be good.<br>
                <br>
                Cheers,<br>
                Daniel
                <div>
                  <div class="h5"><br>
                    <br>
                    <div>On 29/08/14 11:44, Sebastian Damm wrote:<br>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <div>
                    <div class="h5">
                      <div dir="ltr">
                        <div>Hi,<br>
                          <br>
                        </div>
                        <div>I have the following setup:<br>
                          <br>
                        </div>
                        <div>UAC ---> LB ---> Proxy ---> GW<br>
                          <br>
                        </div>
                        <div>In NAT scenarios the loadbalancer detects
                          it, but the proxy communicates with the RTP
                          proxy. I want to send the original caller IP
                          as detected by the loadbalancer (and
                          transported to the proxy) to the RTP proxy. <br>
                          <br>
                        </div>
                        <div>As far as I understand the documentation of
                          the rtpproxy module, I could call
                          rtpproxy_manage with a second parameter,
                          indicating which IP address should be sent to
                          the RTP proxy. I tried sending a
                          pseudovariable, both within quotes or not, or
                          even a static string. But when I look at those
                          messages sent to the RTP proxy, there's always
                          the IP from where the SIP packet was received
                          (the loadbalancer IP) in the request.<br>
                        </div>
                        <div><br>
                          Previously we used the "r" parameter, sending
                          the original IP from the SDP to the proxy. But
                          due to strange behavior of some UACs, we want
                          to get rid of that.<br>
                          <br>
                        </div>
                        <div>Do I misunderstand the second parameter?<br>
                          <br>
                          This is what the documentation says:<br>
                          <span><i>    ip_address</i></span> - new SDP
                          IP address. <br>
                          <br>
                        </div>
                        <div>Unfortunately, I couldn't find any example
                          using this.<br>
                          <br>
                        </div>
                        <div>Best Regards,<br>
                          Sebastian<br>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                      <br>
                      <fieldset></fieldset>
                      <br>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                  <br>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org">sr-users@lists.sip-router.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users">http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://twitter.com/#!/miconda">http://twitter.com/#!/miconda</a> - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda">http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda</a>
Next Kamailio Advanced Trainings 2014 - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.asipto.com">http://www.asipto.com</a>
Sep 22-25, Berlin, Germany ::: Oct 15-17, San Francisco, USA</pre>
  </body>
</html>