<div dir="ltr">Agree<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-07-20 22:18 GMT+03:00 Victor Seva <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:linuxmaniac@torreviejawireless.org" target="_blank">linuxmaniac@torreviejawireless.org</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 07/20/2015 08:58 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:<br>
> My proposal is to move generation of self signed certificates to kamctl.<br>
> There can be a kamctl.tls file to be deployed by the tls package (same<br>
> is done by kamctl.mysql, being part of mysql package), which should add<br>
> a new group of commands, among them something like:<br>
><br>
> kamctl tls generate-certificate<br>
><br>
</span>> Anyone with comments, pros/cons?<br>
<br>
+1 kamctl tls approach<br>
<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
sr-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org">sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Best regards,<br>Alekzander Spiridonov</div>
</div>