<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 18/08/2015 16:00, Jean-Marie Baran
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:55D33A67.8080701@ama.bzh" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 18/08/2015 15:44, Fred Posner
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:55D336B2.3060604@palner.com" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 08/18/2015 09:39 AM, Jean-Marie Baran wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Should I understand that the router should send the packet back to
Kamailio which then send them to the SIP server ?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">RTP packets will flow from client to client or with rtpproxy, from
client <-> rtpproxy <-> client.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Err, I meant RTPproxy, not Kamailio, but yes. In the SDP, is it
maybe smarter to put the Kamailio (RTPproxy) private IP address in
the c= field, so that the client contact directly RTPproxy without
passing through the router first (which does not make much sense
to me).<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Okay, I did not replaced the public address of RTPproxy (ip_public)
in the SDP by its private address (ip_private), but I simply
redirected all the traffic that was going from my computer to
ip_public, to ip_private. Now RTPproxy actually receives the RTP
packets, and relays them to the right IP afterwards ! However there
is still no audio/video, but now it's another problem.<br>
<br>
Thank you for your help Fred.<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<title></title>
<b>Jean-Marie Baran</b></div>
</body>
</html>