<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>Hello,<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/11/16 20:42, Slava Bendersky
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:981933097.5086863.1478634156825.JavaMail.zimbra@skillsearch.ca"
type="cite">
<div style="font-family: lucida console,sans-serif; font-size:
12pt; color: #000000">
<div>Hello Everyone,</div>
<div>My setup is kamailio as proxy with few boxes of freeswitch
in the LAN. Having issue with BYE when extensions register on
different freeswitch boxes. Here are some trace of the call. </div>
<div>Not sure if this tag= miss match or routing.</div>
<div><br data-mce-bogus="1">
</div>
<div>Dispatcher use group 0 with option 4 (round robin).</div>
<div><br data-mce-bogus="1">
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
is group value 0 accepted? I think this may create problems if a
function returns the group in the config as return code -- iirc,
this was changed maybe for lcr or permissions.<br>
<br>
On the other hand, the registrations are quite independent in SIP in
relation with calls. The BYE should be routed based on
record-routing to the freeswitch that was involved in routing
initial INVITE, with no relation to new registrations from end
devices. Is the BYE sent to the freeswitch that got the initial BYE.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Daniel<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://twitter.com/#!/miconda">http://twitter.com/#!/miconda</a> - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda">http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda</a>
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.asipto.com">http://www.asipto.com</a></pre>
</body>
</html>